How can the state take a stand against technology and mechanization By Muntaqim

 Battery-powered rickshaws free people from the stage of pulling vehicles like animals.  Encouraging its circulation, investing in technical research for its excellence, the state is supposed to fulfill its responsibility.

 Of course, I said "invest in technical research for excellence", but our mixer experience is not good.  As a result, I thought, before investing in research, the concept should come from users at the field level.

 A “design and technical development” competition may be organized.  If we encourage rickshaw garage (workshop) mechanics from all over the country to take part in that competition, we may come up with some amazing designs.  If not then, the fine tuning of that design was done by the "Sir" of the Technical University.

 There is no news of fulfilling that responsibility;  However, there is no end to the propaganda against battery-powered rickshaws.  And I don't know the logical reason why it's forbidden.

 Or does it "eat" electricity !!!  Eat and eat!  How much electricity is consumed compared to the waste and looting that is taking place in the power sector?  And, do you eat without a bill?  What a strange excuse!  Outside of waste-corruption, the fact is that if the demand for electricity in the country is created, it is the responsibility of the government to generate that electricity;  What is the fault of the consumer here?

 Complaints about its speed and brakes have been heard for many years;  I would rather ask, no one has been able to find a solution to this problem in so many years ?!  If no one has been able to do this for so many years, isn't it a shame to complain?

 As many buses as there are in Cities, how much fitness does he deserve?  However, standing against the mafia of transport owner-worker leaders, it would not be like the head to take them off the road by putting racks on them!

 Forcible removal from the road, demolition is all oppression.  This should be the answer to oppression.  If not now, we will be responsible for the future.  At least, no one in the High Court can go for a stay?

 When the hungry women from Paris arrived at the Palace of Versailles, Queen Mary Antoinette was very annoyed and asked, Oops, why are they shouting so much?  He was told that they were upset that they were unable to get bread to eat.  The queen said in a very cheerful tone, if you don't get bread, don't shout so much, for now you can eat cake instead of bread!  Living in the comfort of the palace, the queen could not get an idea of ​​the life of the common people of the country.

 The country is now ruled by family.  The new generation of that family has sat in many positions.  They were born in a golden boat, they have no connection with the soil and people of this country.  They have no idea about the life struggle of the hungry naked people of the country.  I saw a stray dog ​​on the street and said, there are no stray dogs on the street in developed countries!  Who will tell him that in developed countries there is no dirt on the streets.  And if there is no dirt, the dog will be gone.  So, remove the dirt, not the dog.

 The country has now progressed to such an extent that even though there are no bullock carts, people are drawn to Dedarse in the capital city.  Foolishness again, people will pull the vehicle like animals, do not object to that, but will free people from working like animals, object to that vehicle!

 Without destroying the battery rickshaw by forcibly removing it from the road, it fixes its technical defects in the brain.  If you want to snatch food from working people, make a better option first.

 When it comes to removing a dog without removing the dirt, one's own intellectual and political abilities are revealed.